The Vancouver Taxi Association says it will no longer subsidize drivers who operate accessible vehicles, claiming sudden competition from ride-hailing means taxi companies can no longer afford it.
Without the subsidies, the association said, drivers are less likely to choose an accessible van because it will cost them more out of pocket.
“I want to make it crystal clear — we have not stopped trying to service these trips. We’re doing our best to try and service these trips,” said Kalwant Sahota, speaking Wednesday for the Vancouver Taxi Association.
“But if I’ve only got so many vehicles on the road, if there’s an operator on the road, he’s got a choice of driving a car which costs much much less to operate. At the end of day, he wants money to take home.”
The decision is the latest from the taxi sector in a continued turf war with Uber and Lyft over business in the region, and it’s a move that leaves customers with disabilities feeling caught in the crossfire.
“I find it very worrisome,” said disability advocate Laura Makenrot. “We know already that there isn’t enough supply of wheelchair-accessible taxis in general around Metro Vancouver, and that’s been a problem for years … I’m worried this news now will make wait time for people with disabilities using wheelchairs even longer.”
And she says simply relying on other services like HandyDart doesn’t cut it because they don’t offer the same freedom and spontaneity as taxis.
Taxi companies have previously helped drivers who operate accessible vehicles because the vans are typically more expensive to run than smaller cabs, meaning drivers who use them make less profit.
Some companies waived dispatch fees or offered a $5 bonus per trip. Others rewarded drivers with a front-of-the-line position in the dispatch centre after taking a trip in an accessible van.
The taxi association said companies are now stopping those incentives, less than a week after Uber and Lyft launched in Metro Vancouver. The move effectively discourages taxi drivers from choosing the accessible vans when they arrive for a shift.
“Drivers want to switch over from the vans onto the cars,” said Sahota, who is also the president of Yellow Cab.
Sahota said cab drivers have been seeing fewer trips in general because customers are turning to ride-hailing. So, when drivers do get fares, they don’t want to lose profit by driving a van suited for accessible passengers.
Sometimes, Sahota said, drivers make double when they drive a sedan instead of a van.
“We can’t force someone to operate the vehicle. I understand. Their expenses are extremely high,” said Carolyn Bauer, also with the Vancouver Taxi Association.
Sahota and Bauer said the taxi lobbyists wants the province to level the industry by capping fleet sizes for ride-hailing companies, enforcing stricter pricing rules so ride-hailing is more in line with cab fares, and offering insurance breaks for cab drivers.
Sahota called on the province to step in and offer incentives, so companies don’t have to bear that cost themselves.
The province does not currently provide subsidies or incentives to cab companies, it said in a statement from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.
Providing a certain number of accessible taxis, it says, is part of the licensing requirement of many taxi companies.
“Companies who do not abide by the terms and conditions of their licence can face administrative penalties of up to $50,000 at the registrar’s discretion,” it said.
In terms of Uber and Lyft, the province says it has set a 30 cent fee per trip for ride-hailing services.
This fee, it says, is “intended to support accessible transportation and administration of ride-hail services.”